Find Your Strongest 510(k) Predicate in Minutes
AI-powered predicate analysis backed by 91,000+ FDA clearance packages, semantic search, and FDA Best Practices compliance scoring.
Built for Health-Tech Teams Navigating FDA Clearance
Startup Founders
First 510(k) submission? Get expert-level predicate analysis without the $5,000+ consultant fee. Understand your regulatory landscape before you spend.
Regulatory Affairs
Validate your predicate selection with data-driven scoring, FDA Best Practices compliance, and ready-to-use 510(k) Summary text. Save hours of manual research.
Investors & Advisors
Evaluate regulatory feasibility in minutes. Understand pathway risk, competitive landscape, and predicate strength before committing capital.
From Device Description to Regulatory Strategy in 4 Steps
Describe Your Device
Enter your device description and intended use. Optionally specify if it's an AI/ML device or a modification of your own cleared device.
We Search 91K+ Clearances
Hybrid search combines openFDA structured data with semantic similarity across the full 510(k) summary corpus. Cross-code discovery finds predicates keyword search misses.
AI Analyzes Everything
Claude evaluates candidates against FDA's 4 Best Practices, scores substantial equivalence across 8 eSTAR dimensions, and traces predicate lineage chains.
Get Your Report
Download an 18-page branded PDF with predicate recommendation, lineage chains, pathway decision, and ready-to-use 510(k) Summary narrative.
Not Just a Database Search
Most predicate tools search by product code and sort by date. We do something fundamentally different.
FDA Best Practices Aligned
Every predicate is scored against FDA's September 2023 guidance: well-established methods, safety performance, no unmitigated issues, no design-related recalls. You get a compliance scorecard, not just a list.
Semantic Search Across 91K+ Submissions
We don't just match product codes. Our vector database embeds every 510(k) summary and finds semantically similar devices across ALL product codes — catching predicates keyword search misses entirely.
Predicate Lineage Chains
See who your predicate cited as THEIR predicate, and who they cited. Trace citation chains 3 levels deep from actual 510(k) summary text. Understand chain depth and risk before FDA asks.
AI-Powered Scoring & Analysis
Claude Sonnet evaluates candidates with 50% intended use, 35% technology similarity, 15% recency weighting — then produces an 8-dimension substantial equivalence comparison aligned with eSTAR format.
Regulatory Pathway Decision Engine
Not just "510(k)" — we evaluate Traditional, Special, Abbreviated, De Novo, Breakthrough Device, and PMA pathways with specific eligibility reasoning, PCCP assessment, and pre-submission meeting recommendations.
Ready-to-Use 510(k) Summary Text
Get a multi-paragraph predicate selection narrative formatted per FDA guidance Section VI. Explains predicate choice, best practices compliance, and substantial equivalence basis. Copy, adapt, submit.
18-Page Predicate Intelligence Report
Every report includes comprehensive regulatory intelligence ready for your team, your board, or your regulatory consultant.
$499per report
One-time purchase. No subscription required.
- ✓ Full 18-page intelligence report
- ✓ FDA Best Practices compliance scoring
- ✓ Semantic search across 91K+ clearances
- ✓ Predicate lineage chain analysis
- ✓ Ready-to-use 510(k) Summary narrative
- ✓ Regulatory pathway decision with alternatives
- ✓ Downloadable branded PDF
Need multiple reports? Ask about consultant plans.
Built on FDA Guidance
The tool's predicate selection methodology is anchored in FDA's September 2023 "Best Practices for Selecting a Predicate Device" guidance, supported by the documents listed below. Every report cites the specific guidance informing each section.
- Primary Methodology Reference
Best Practices for Selecting a Predicate Device to Support a Premarket Notification [510(k)] Submission
September 2023PRIMARY METHODOLOGY REFERENCE. Defines the four best-practice criteria for predicate selection — (1) well-established methods, (2) postmarket safety performance, (3) no unmitigated safety issues, (4) no design-related recall — that drive the FDA Best Practices Scorecard in every report this tool generates.
Open on FDA.gov →
-
The 510(k) Program: Evaluating Substantial Equivalence in Premarket Notifications [510(k)]
July 2014Foundational SE-determination framework that the 2023 Best Practices guidance sits inside. Defines how indications, technological characteristics, and performance data combine to demonstrate substantial equivalence — the structure the SE Comparison table in this report follows.
Open on FDA.gov →
-
De Novo Classification Process (Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation)
October 2021Pathway for novel, low-to-moderate risk devices without an adequate predicate.
Open on FDA.gov →
-
Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Device Software Functions: Lifecycle Management and Marketing Submission Recommendations
January 2025Lifecycle-management expectations and submission content for AI-enabled devices.
Open on FDA.gov →
-
Marketing Submission Recommendations for a Predetermined Change Control Plan for AI/ML-Enabled Device Software Functions
December 2024PCCP framework — how to pre-authorize planned algorithm changes without re-submitting.
Open on FDA.gov →
-
Breakthrough Devices Program
September 2023Expedited development and review for devices addressing life-threatening or irreversibly debilitating conditions.
Open on FDA.gov →
-
Clinical Decision Support Software
September 2022Criteria for when CDS software is / is not a regulated device under 21st Century Cures.
Open on FDA.gov →
-
Software as a Medical Device (SaMD): Clinical Evaluation
December 2017Framework for generating clinical evidence to support SaMD.
Open on FDA.gov →
-
Software as a Medical Device (SaMD): Possible Framework for Risk Categorization and Corresponding Considerations
September 2014 (IMDRF)IMDRF risk categorization (I–IV) referenced in the AI/ML assessment section.
Open on FDA.gov →
-
eSTAR Program
OngoingElectronic submission template mandatory for most 510(k) submissions. The eSTAR Mapping section aligns each analysis area to the corresponding eSTAR section.
Open on FDA.gov →
Frequently Asked Questions
How accurate is the predicate recommendation?
What data sources do you use?
Can I use this for AI/ML medical devices?
How is this different from searching openFDA myself?
Is the report suitable for my 510(k) submission?
Do you offer consultant or multi-report plans?
How often is the database updated?
Ready to Find Your Predicate?
Get your 510(k) Predicate Intelligence Report in minutes.
This tool is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute regulatory, legal, or professional advice. All analysis is AI-generated and should be reviewed by a qualified regulatory professional. Data sourced from openFDA and publicly available 510(k) clearance packages. Terms · Privacy · FDA.gov